[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <006001c836ff$f0d59a30$9c94fea9@jason>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:30:10 +0900
From: "Joonwoo Park" <joonwpark81@...il.com>
To: "'Herbert Xu'" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'David Miller'" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] NET: ASSERT_RTNL in __dev_set_promiscuity makes debug warning
2007/12/5, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>:
> Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@...il.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > dev_set_rx_mode calls __dev_set_rx_mode with softirq disabled (by netif_tx_lock_bh)
> > therefore __dev_set_promiscuity can be called with softirq disabled.
> > It will cause in_interrupt() to return true and ASSERT_RTNL warning.
> > Is there a good solution to fix it besides blowing ASSERT_RTNL up?
>
> We've talked this one before on netdev. It's on my todo list to fix.
> The correct solution is to untangle this so that __dev_set_promiscuity
> does not get called in the first place on BH paths.
>
> Unfortunately I've been busy so I haven't completed the patches yet.
> But as this problem is not urgent let's not just put on a bandaid.
>
Thanks Herbert,
According to your opinion I tried a patch against davem/net-2.6.git
Thanks.
Joonwoo
[NET]: Fix to __dev_set_promiscuity does not get called with softirq is disabled
Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park <joonwpark81@...il.com>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 3 +-
net/core/dev.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
net/core/dev_mcast.c | 21 +++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 1e6af4f..6532405 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -1403,7 +1403,8 @@ extern int register_netdev(struct net_device *dev);
extern void unregister_netdev(struct net_device *dev);
/* Functions used for secondary unicast and multicast support */
extern void dev_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev);
-extern void __dev_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev);
+extern int __dev_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev);
+extern void __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(struct net_device *dev);
extern int dev_unicast_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen);
extern int dev_unicast_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen);
extern int dev_mc_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int all);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 86d6261..eb1a11f 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -2822,39 +2822,50 @@ void dev_set_allmulti(struct net_device *dev, int inc)
* filtering it is put in promiscous mode while unicast addresses
* are present.
*/
-void __dev_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
+int __dev_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
{
/* dev_open will call this function so the list will stay sane. */
if (!(dev->flags&IFF_UP))
- return;
+ return 0;
if (!netif_device_present(dev))
- return;
+ return 0;
- if (dev->set_rx_mode)
+ if (dev->set_rx_mode) {
dev->set_rx_mode(dev);
- else {
- /* Unicast addresses changes may only happen under the rtnl,
- * therefore calling __dev_set_promiscuity here is safe.
- */
- if (dev->uc_count > 0 && !dev->uc_promisc) {
- __dev_set_promiscuity(dev, 1);
- dev->uc_promisc = 1;
- } else if (dev->uc_count == 0 && dev->uc_promisc) {
- __dev_set_promiscuity(dev, -1);
- dev->uc_promisc = 0;
- }
+ return 0;
+ }
+ return 1;
+}
- if (dev->set_multicast_list)
- dev->set_multicast_list(dev);
+void __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ BUG_TRAP(dev->flags&IFF_UP);
+ BUG_TRAP(netif_device_present(dev));
+
+ /* Unicast addresses changes may only happen under the rtnl,
+ * therefore calling __dev_set_promiscuity here is safe.
+ */
+ if (dev->uc_count > 0 && !dev->uc_promisc) {
+ __dev_set_promiscuity(dev, 1);
+ dev->uc_promisc = 1;
+ } else if (dev->uc_count == 0 && dev->uc_promisc) {
+ __dev_set_promiscuity(dev, -1);
+ dev->uc_promisc = 0;
}
+
+ if (dev->set_multicast_list)
+ dev->set_multicast_list(dev);
}
void dev_set_rx_mode(struct net_device *dev)
{
+ int pending;
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
- __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
+ pending = __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
+ if (pending)
+ __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(dev);
}
int __dev_addr_delete(struct dev_addr_list **list, int *count,
@@ -2929,14 +2940,17 @@ int __dev_addr_add(struct dev_addr_list **list, int *count,
int dev_unicast_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen)
{
int err;
+ int pending = 0;
ASSERT_RTNL();
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_delete(&dev->uc_list, &dev->uc_count, addr, alen, 0);
if (!err)
- __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
+ pending = __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
+ if (pending)
+ __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(dev);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_unicast_delete);
@@ -2955,14 +2969,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_unicast_delete);
int dev_unicast_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen)
{
int err;
+ int pending = 0;
ASSERT_RTNL();
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_add(&dev->uc_list, &dev->uc_count, addr, alen, 0);
if (!err)
- __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
+ pending = __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
+ if (pending)
+ __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(dev);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_unicast_add);
diff --git a/net/core/dev_mcast.c b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
index 69fff16..0170359 100644
--- a/net/core/dev_mcast.c
+++ b/net/core/dev_mcast.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
int dev_mc_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
{
int err;
+ int pending = 0;
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_delete(&dev->mc_list, &dev->mc_count,
@@ -81,9 +82,11 @@ int dev_mc_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
* loaded filter is now wrong. Fix it
*/
- __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
+ pending = __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
}
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
+ if (pending)
+ __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(dev);
return err;
}
@@ -94,12 +97,15 @@ int dev_mc_delete(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
int dev_mc_add(struct net_device *dev, void *addr, int alen, int glbl)
{
int err;
+ int pending = 0;
netif_tx_lock_bh(dev);
err = __dev_addr_add(&dev->mc_list, &dev->mc_count, addr, alen, glbl);
if (!err)
- __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
+ pending = __dev_set_rx_mode(dev);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(dev);
+ if (pending)
+ __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(dev);
return err;
}
@@ -119,6 +125,7 @@ int dev_mc_sync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
{
struct dev_addr_list *da, *next;
int err = 0;
+ int pending = 0;
netif_tx_lock_bh(to);
da = from->mc_list;
@@ -140,9 +147,11 @@ int dev_mc_sync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
da = next;
}
if (!err)
- __dev_set_rx_mode(to);
+ pending = __dev_set_rx_mode(to);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(to);
+ if (pending)
+ __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(to);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_mc_sync);
@@ -161,6 +170,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_mc_sync);
void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
{
struct dev_addr_list *da, *next;
+ int pending;
netif_tx_lock_bh(from);
netif_tx_lock_bh(to);
@@ -177,10 +187,13 @@ void dev_mc_unsync(struct net_device *to, struct net_device *from)
}
da = next;
}
- __dev_set_rx_mode(to);
+ pending = __dev_set_rx_mode(to);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(to);
netif_tx_unlock_bh(from);
+
+ if (pending)
+ __dev_set_rx_mode_fini(to);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_mc_unsync);
---
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists