[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47578C29.9000007@am.sony.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:44:09 -0800
From: Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@...sony.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>,
miltonm@....com, clameter@....com, apw@...dowen.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, y-goto@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: PS3: trouble with SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP and kexec
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:52:48 +0100 (CET)
> Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com> wrote:
>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Subject: sparsemem: sparse_add_one_section() may fail to allocate memory
>>
>> sparsemem: sparse_add_one_section() may fail to allocate memory, and must check
>> whether the allocation succeeded before proceeding to touch the allocated
>> memory.
>>
>> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@...ycom.com>
>> ---
>> FIXME There are still some possible memory leaks in sparse_add_one_section():
>> - usemap is never deallocated
>> - __kfree_section_memmap() is a not yet implemented dummy
>
> I already had
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/broken-out/mm-sparsec-improve-the-error-handling-for-sparse_add_one_section.patch
This one has an error in it. A patch to fix it is below.
> and
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc4/2.6.24-rc4-mm1/broken-out/mm-sparsec-check-the-return-value-of-sparse_index_alloc.patch
>
> queued. Do they fix the problem, and should they be merged in 2.6.24?
These two plus my fix below allow the hot plug add_memory() call to fail
gracefully and for the platform code to continue to boot on the
128MB of boot mem.
With ps3_defconfig the condition is only hit by the second stage
kexec'ed (kboot) kernel, which is not generally built by end users,
but there is a chance this condition would be hit by custom kernel
config, so I think they should go in for 2.6.24.
I'll continue to work on a fix for the memory allocation failure.
-Geoff
------------------
Subject: sparsemem: Fix sparse_index_init return check
sparse_index_init() returns -EEXIST to indicate the index
has already been created. Exclude this from the error check
on the return value.
Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand@...sony.com>
---
mm/sparse.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/sparse.c
+++ b/mm/sparse.c
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ int sparse_add_one_section(struct zone *
* plus, it does a kmalloc
*/
ret = sparse_index_init(section_nr, pgdat->node_id);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0 && ret != -EEXIST)
return ret;
memmap = kmalloc_section_memmap(section_nr, pgdat->node_id, nr_pages);
if (!memmap)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists