linux-kernel - Re: [Patch] net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: Some small improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071206.031434.179419183.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:14:34 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	akpm@...l.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: Some small improvements

From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 19:01:23 +0800

> 
> This patch contains the following changes.
> 
> 	- Use 'bool' instead of 'int' for booleans.
> 	- Use 'size_t' instead of 'int' for 'sizeof' return value.
> 	- Some style fixes.
> 
> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>

Normally I would let a patch like this sit in my mailbox
for a week and then delete it.

But this time I'll just let you know up front that I
don't see much value in this patch.  It is not a clear
improvement to replace int's with bool's in my mind and
the other changes are just whitespace changes.

And thus I can delete the patch from my mailbox
immediately :-)

Sorry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/