linux-kernel - Re: Patch submission question [not in the FAQ]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712061559210.19266@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:01:42 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Gabriele Gorla <gorlik@...oo.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Patch submission question [not in the FAQ]


On Dec 5 2007 03:36, Gabriele Gorla wrote:
>@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ typedef struct TAG_TW_Passthru
>        unsigned char padding[12];
> } TW_Passthru;
> 
>+#pragma pack()
>+
> typedef struct TAG_TW_Device_Extension {
>        u32                     base_addr;
>        unsigned long
>*alignment_virtual_address[TW_Q_LENGTH];
>@@ -430,6 +432,4 @@ typedef struct
>TAG_TW_Device_Extension {
>        wait_queue_head_t       ioctl_wqueue;
> } TW_Device_Extension;
> 
>-#pragma pack()
>-

Hmpf. Can't you __attribute__((packed))-ify the structs rather
than use #pragma?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/