[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b1bc6a000712061337o189b96bal45c0b7b5b7d47568@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:37:28 -0800
From: "adam radford" <aradford@...il.com>
To: "Gabriele Gorla" <gorlik@...oo.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Patch submission question [not in the FAQ]
On Dec 5, 2007 3:36 AM, Gabriele Gorla <gorlik@...oo.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I have submitted a patch for the 3x-xxxx driver on
> alpha several months ago to both the driver maintainer
> and the linux-scsi mailing list.
> I have read all the FAQ and I tried to stick to the
> instructions to the letter.
> However the patch has been completely ignored. No
> reply, no comment, no flames, absolutely nothing...
>
> the original email submission is at the end of the
> email.
>
> could anyone please explain what I am doing wrong?
>
> thanks,
> GG
Gabriele,
I ignored your patch because:
1. I do not believe you have the 3w-xxxx driver running on an
alpha SMP system.
2. I removed the bitfields from the 3w-xxxx driver but I have
yet to add full big endian support due to lack of demand. I have
such a patch for this driver (which already includes the unpacking
of the wait_queue_head_t variable) but I have not submitted it to
the main-line kernel. The in-kernel 3w-xxxx driver is still missing
the byte-swaps.
The 3w-9xxx (9000 series 3ware driver) has full big endian support.
3. Your patch was garbled.
Is this an official request for big endian support for the 3w-xxxx driver or
are you looking for anybody who has a packed 'wait_queue_head_t' and
submitting a patch to fix it?
-Adam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists