[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47584429.8060801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:19:13 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rsa@...ibm.com, apw@...dowen.org,
balbir@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kobject changes broken with hvcs driver on powerpc
Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:49:59PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>
>>> The 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 kernel build fails with build failure,
>>>
>>> CC drivers/char/hvcs.o
>>> drivers/char/hvcs.c: In function ‘hvcs_open’:
>>> drivers/char/hvcs.c:1180: error: wrong type argument to unary exclamation mark
>>> make[2]: *** [drivers/char/hvcs.o] Error 1
>>> make[1]: *** [drivers/char] Error 2
>>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>>
>>> The kref_get begin void return type, check for the kobject return type
>>> as in the previous kobject_get()
>>>
>>> if (!kref_get(&hvcsd->kref)) {
>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
>>> printk(KERN_ERR "HVCS: Kobject of open"
>>> " hvcs doesn't exist.\n");
>>> return -EFAULT; /* Is this the right return value? */
>>> }
>>>
>>> I have tested for the build failure only.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> --
>>> --- linux-2.6.24-rc4/drivers/char/hvcs.c 2007-12-05 12:17:37.000000000 +0530
>>> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc4/drivers/char/~hvcs.c 2007-12-05 19:17:12.000000000 +0530
>>> @@ -1177,12 +1177,8 @@ fast_open:
>>> hvcsd = tty->driver_data;
>>>
>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
>>> - if (!kref_get(&hvcsd->kref)) {
>>> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
>>> - printk(KERN_ERR "HVCS: Kobject of open"
>>> - " hvcs doesn't exist.\n");
>>> - return -EFAULT; /* Is this the right return value? */
>>> - }
>>> + kref_get(&hvcsd->kref);
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hvcsd->lock, flags);
>>>
>> Why release the spinlock here? It's done after the count is incremented.
>> This patch does not seem correct.
>
> Doh, you are correct, I'll make sure that I fix this up before applying
> it.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Sorry, my fault for overlooking that, thanks greg.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists