[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47597612.4080508@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 19:34:26 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>,
Nick Warne <nick@...sn.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Peculiar out-of-sync boot log lines
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> [PATCH] ide: DMA reporting and validity checking fixes (take 2)
> * ide_xfer_verbose() fixups:
> - beautify returned mode names
> - fix PIO5 reporting
> - make it return 'const char *'
> * Change printk() level from KERN_DEBUG to KERN_INFO in ide_find_dma_mode().
> * Add ide_id_dma_bug() helper based on ide_dma_verbose() to check for invalid
> DMA info in identify block.
> * Use ide_id_dma_bug() in ide_tune_dma() and ide_driveid_update().
> As a result DMA won't be tuned or will be disabled after tuning if device
> reports inconsistent info about enabled DMA mode (ide_dma_verbose() does the
> same checks while the IDE device is probed by ide-{cd,disk} device driver).
> * Since (id->capability & 1) && id->tDMA is a valid configuration handle
> it correctly in ide_id_dma_bug().
Huh? You don't check (id->capability & 1) there...
> * Remove no longer needed ide_dma_verbose().
> This patch should fix the following problem with out-of-sync IDE messages
> reported by Nick Warne:
> hdd: ATAPI 48X DVD-ROM DVD-R-RAM CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache<7>hdd:
> skipping word 93 validity check
> , UDMA(66)
> and later debugged by Mark Lord to be caused by:
> ide_dma_verbose()
> printk( ... "2048kB Cache");
> eighty_ninty_three()
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: skipping word 93 validity check\n");
> ide_dma_verbose()
> printk(", UDMA(66)"
> Please note that as a result ide-{cd,disk} device drivers won't report the
> DMA speed used but this is intended since now DMA mode being used is always
> reported by IDE core code.
> v2:
> * fixes suggested by Randy:
> - use KERN_CONT for printk()-s in ide-{cd,disk}.c
> - don't remove argument name from ide_xfer_verbose() declaration
> Cc: Nick Warne <nick@...sn.org>
> Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
[...]
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-dma.c
> @@ -806,58 +809,26 @@ static int ide_dma_check(ide_drive_t *dr
> return vdma ? 0 : -1;
> }
>
> -void ide_dma_verbose(ide_drive_t *drive)
> +int ide_id_dma_bug(ide_drive_t *drive)
> {
> - struct hd_driveid *id = drive->id;
> - ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
> + struct hd_driveid *id = drive->id;
>
> if (id->field_valid & 4) {
> if ((id->dma_ultra >> 8) && (id->dma_mword >> 8))
[...]
> + goto err_out;
> } else if (id->field_valid & 2) {
> if ((id->dma_mword >> 8) && (id->dma_1word >> 8))
> - goto bug_dma_off;
> - printk(", DMA");
> + goto err_out;
> } else if (id->field_valid & 1) {
Hm, bit 0 only gurantees that current translation
> - goto bug_dma_off;
> + if (id->tDMA == 0)
Despite the name, this is not a transfer period but SW DMA mode number, so
why mode 0 is bad?
> + goto err_out;
> }
> - return;
> -bug_dma_off:
> - printk(", BUG DMA OFF");
> - hwif->dma_off_quietly(drive);
> - return;
> + return 0;
> +err_out:
> + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: bad DMA info in identify block\n", drive->name);
> + return 1;
> }
>
> Index: b/drivers/ide/ide-lib.c
> ===================================================================
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-lib.c
> @@ -29,41 +29,44 @@
> * Add common non I/O op stuff here. Make sure it has proper
> * kernel-doc function headers or your patch will be rejected
> */
> -
> +
> +static const char *udma_str[] =
> + { "UDMA/16", "UDMA/25", "UDMA/33", "UDMA/44",
> + "UDMA/66", "UDMA/100", "UDMA/133", "UDMA7" };
> +static const char *mwdma_str[] =
> + { "MWDMA0", "MWDMA1", "MWDMA2" };
> +static const char *swdma_str[] =
> + { "SWDMA0", "SWDMA1", "SWDMA2" };
> +static const char *pio_str[] =
> + { "PIO0", "PIO1", "PIO2", "PIO3", "PIO4", "PIO5" };
>
> /**
> * ide_xfer_verbose - return IDE mode names
> - * @xfer_rate: rate to name
> + * @mode: transfer mode
> *
> * Returns a constant string giving the name of the mode
> * requested.
> */
>
> -char *ide_xfer_verbose (u8 xfer_rate)
> +const char *ide_xfer_verbose(u8 mode)
> {
[...]
> + const char *s;
> + u8 i = mode & 0xf;
> +
> + if (mode >= XFER_UDMA_0 && mode <= XFER_UDMA_7)
> + s = udma_str[i];
> + else if (mode >= XFER_MW_DMA_0 && mode <= XFER_MW_DMA_2)
> + s = mwdma_str[i];
> + else if (mode >= XFER_SW_DMA_0 && mode <= XFER_SW_DMA_2)
> + s = swdma_str[i];
> + else if (mode >= XFER_PIO_0 && mode <= XFER_PIO_5)
> + s = pio_str[i & 0x7];
> + else if (mode == XFER_PIO_SLOW)
> + s = "XFER SLOW";
Not "PIO SLOW"?
> + else
> + s = "XFER ERROR";
> +
> + return s;
> }
MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists