linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:48:52 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
	Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler: fix x86 regression in native_sched_clock

On Friday 07 December 2007 22:17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au> wrote:
> > > ah, printk_clock() still uses sched_clock(), not jiffies. So it's
> > > not the jiffies counter that goes back and forth, it's sched_clock()
> > > - so this is a printk timestamps anomaly, not related to jiffies. I
> > > thought we have fixed this bug in the printk code already:
> > > sched_clock() is a 'raw' interface that should not be used directly
> > > - the proper interface is cpu_clock(cpu).
> >
> > It's a single CPU box, so sched_clock() jumping would still be
> > problematic, no?
>
> sched_clock() is an internal API - the non-jumping API to be used by
> printk is cpu_clock().

You know why sched_clock jumps when the TSC frequency changes, right?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/