[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071207170334.GA13832@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 20:03:34 +0300
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] uglify while_each_pid_task() to make sure we don't count the execing pricess twice
There is a window when de_thread() switches the leader and drops tasklist_lock.
In that window do_each_pid_task(PIDTYPE_PID) finds both new and old leaders.
The problem is pretty much theoretical and probably can be ignored. Currently
the only users of do_each_pid_task(PIDTYPE_PID) are send_sigio/send_sigurg, so
they can send the signal to the same process twice.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
--- PT/include/linux/pid.h~2_do_each_pid_task 2007-10-25 16:22:12.000000000 +0400
+++ PT/include/linux/pid.h 2007-12-07 18:24:21.000000000 +0300
@@ -160,7 +160,13 @@ static inline pid_t pid_vnr(struct pid *
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu((task), pos___, \
&pid->tasks[type], pids[type].node) {
+ /*
+ * Both old and new leaders may be attached to
+ * the same pid in the middle of de_thread().
+ */
#define while_each_pid_task(pid, type, task) \
+ if (type == PIDTYPE_PID) \
+ break; \
} \
} while (0)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists