[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071208075735.4700bcac@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 07:57:35 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: scale cyc_2_nsec according to CPU frequency
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:52:06 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr> wrote:
>
> > Le Fri, 7 Dec 2007 14:55:25 +0100,
> > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> a ??crit :
> >
> > > Firstly, we dont need the 'offset' anymore because cpu_clock()
> > > maintains offsets itself.
> >
> > Yes, but a lower quality one. __update_rq_clock tries to compensate
> > large jumping clocks with a jiffy resolution, while my offset
> > arranges for a very smooth frequency transition.
>
> yes, but that would be easy to fix up via calling
> sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(0) when doing a frequency transition,
> without burdening the normal sched_clock() codepath with the offset.
> See the attached latest version.
can this deal with dual/quad core where the frequency of one core
changes if the sofware changes the frequency of the other core?
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists