[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071208191629.GB21186@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 20:16:29 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@...imi.it>,
Robert Love <rml@...h9.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: scale cyc_2_nsec according to CPU frequency
* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > Firstly, we dont need the 'offset' anymore because cpu_clock()
> > > > maintains offsets itself.
> > >
> > > Yes, but a lower quality one. __update_rq_clock tries to
> > > compensate large jumping clocks with a jiffy resolution, while my
> > > offset arranges for a very smooth frequency transition.
> >
> > yes, but that would be easy to fix up via calling
> > sched_clock_idle_wakeup_event(0) when doing a frequency transition,
> > without burdening the normal sched_clock() codepath with the offset.
> > See the attached latest version.
>
> can this deal with dual/quad core where the frequency of one core
> changes if the sofware changes the frequency of the other core?
doesnt the notifier still get run on the target CPU?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists