[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475AD585.7020908@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 11:33:57 -0600
From: Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@...hat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@...hat.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Ray Lee <ray@...rabbit.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@...schlus.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why does reading from /dev/urandom deplete entropy so much?
Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 02:37:57AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>>> BTW, You may be better off using "uuidgen -t" to generate the UUID in
>>> the smolt RPM, since that will use 12 bits of randomness from
>>> /dev/random, plus the MAC, address and timestamp. So even if there is
>>> zero randomness in /dev/random, and the time is January 1, 1970, at
>>> least the MAC will contribute some uniqueness to the UUID.
>>>
>> I haven't checked how uuidgen uses the MAC, but I would suggest that
>> that is not something Fedora should jump at doing - although it would
>> help ensure unique UUIDs, it also contributes to the tinfoil hat
>> responses that usually come up with things like smolt.
>>
>
> Huh? What's the concern? All you are submitting is a list of
> hardware devices in your system. That's hardly anything sensitive....
>
We actually had a very vocal minority about all of that which ended up
putting us in the unfortunate position of generating a random UUID
instead of using a hardware UUID from hal :-/
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists