[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475AD7D0.8040905@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 18:43:44 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: broken suspend (sched related) [Was: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1]
On 12/08/2007 04:24 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i'm wondering why it had no effect now - the new code is in essence a
> NOP over what we had.
Maybe a dumb question. Why those changes in process_32.c in the patch and not in
process_64.c?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists