lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712092103560.11165@ask.diku.dk> Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:05:30 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> To: fpavlic@...ibm.com, wangchen@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] Fix use of skb after netif_rx From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> Recently, Wang Chen submitted a patch (d30f53aeb31d453a5230f526bea592af07944564) to move a call to netif_rx(skb) after a subsequent reference to skb, because netif_rx may call kfree_skb on its argument. netif_rx_ni calls netif_rx, so the same problem occurs in the files below. I have left the updating of dev->last_rx after the calls to netif_rx_ni because it seems time dependent, but moved the other field updates before. This was found using the following semantic match. (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // <smpl> @@ expression skb, e,e1; @@ ( netif_rx(skb); | netif_rx_ni(skb); ) ... when != skb = e ( skb = e1 | * skb ) // </smpl> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk> --- diff a/drivers/s390/net/ctcmain.c b/drivers/s390/net/ctcmain.c --- a/drivers/s390/net/ctcmain.c 2007-12-05 09:21:56.000000000 +0100 +++ b/drivers/s390/net/ctcmain.c 2007-12-05 19:03:40.000000000 +0100 @@ -478,14 +478,14 @@ ctc_unpack_skb(struct channel *ch, struc skb->dev = pskb->dev; skb->protocol = pskb->protocol; pskb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; - netif_rx_ni(skb); /** - * Successful rx; reset logflags + * reset logflags */ ch->logflags = 0; - dev->last_rx = jiffies; privptr->stats.rx_packets++; privptr->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len; + netif_rx_ni(skb); + dev->last_rx = jiffies; if (len > 0) { skb_pull(pskb, header->length); if (skb_tailroom(pskb) < LL_HEADER_LENGTH) { diff a/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c b/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c --- a/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c 2007-10-22 11:25:20.000000000 +0200 +++ b/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c 2007-12-05 19:03:10.000000000 +0100 @@ -639,14 +639,14 @@ static void netiucv_unpack_skb(struct iu skb->dev = pskb->dev; skb->protocol = pskb->protocol; pskb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; + privptr->stats.rx_packets++; + privptr->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len; /* * Since receiving is always initiated from a tasklet (in iucv.c), * we must use netif_rx_ni() instead of netif_rx() */ netif_rx_ni(skb); dev->last_rx = jiffies; - privptr->stats.rx_packets++; - privptr->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len; skb_pull(pskb, header->next); skb_put(pskb, NETIUCV_HDRLEN); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists