[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475EBFBA.6090301@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:50:02 +0100
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "linux-os (Dick Johnson)" <linux-os@...logic.com>,
David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>,
Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, rol@...be.net, dpreed@...d.com
Subject: Re: RFC: outb 0x80 in inb_p, outb_p harmful on some modern AMD64
with MCP51 laptops
On 11-12-07 17:30, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Anyways it looks like the discussion here is going in a
> a loop. I had hoped David would post his test results with
> another port so that we know for sure that the bus aborts
> (and not port 80) is the problem on his box. But it looks like
> he doesn't want to do this. Still removing the bus aborts
> is probably the correct way to go forward.
Yes, I do also still want to know that. David (Reed)?
> Only needs a patch now. If nobody beats me to it i'll
> add one later to my tree.
Pavel Machek already posted one. His udelay(8) wants to be less -- 1 or "to
be safe" perhaps 2.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/9/131
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists