[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475F0B07.2060303@jlab.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:11:19 -0500
From: Jie Chen <chen@...b.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jie Chen <chen@...b.org> wrote:
>
>> The following is pthread_sync output for 2.6.21.7-cfs-v24 #1 SMP
>> kernel.
>
>> 2 threads:
>
>> PARALLEL time = 11.106580 microseconds +/- 0.002460
>> PARALLEL overhead = 0.617590 microseconds +/- 0.003409
>
>> Output for Kernel 2.6.24-rc4 #1 SMP
>
>> PARALLEL time = 19.668450 microseconds +/- 0.015782
>> PARALLEL overhead = 9.157945 microseconds +/- 0.018217
>
> ok, so the problem is that this PARALLEL time has an additional +9 usecs
> overhead, right? I dont see this myself on a Core2 CPU:
>
> PARALLEL time = 10.446933 microseconds +/- 0.078849
> PARALLEL overhead = 0.751732 microseconds +/- 0.177446
>
> Ingo
Hi, Ingo:
Yes, the extra 9 usecs overhead for running two threads in the 2.6.24
kernel when there are total of 8 cores (2 quad opterons). What is the
total number of cores do you have? I do not have machines that have dual
quad Xeons here for direct comparisons. Thank you.
--
#############################################################################
# Jie Chen
# Scientific Computing Group
# Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
# Newport News, VA 23606
#
# chen@...b.org
# (757)269-5046 (office)
# (757)269-6248 (fax)
#############################################################################
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists