linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Mark timer_stats as incompatible with multiple pid namespaces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1r6hqstat.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:55:22 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark timer_stats as incompatible with multiple pid namespaces

Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:

> * Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>> /proc/timer_stats currently reports the user of a timer by pid, which 
>> is a reasonable approach.  However if you are not in the initial pid 
>> namespace the pid that is reported is nonsense.
>> 
>> Therefore until we can make timer_stats pid namespace safe just 
>> disable it in the build if pid namespace support is selected so we at 
>> least know we have a conflict.
>
> What the heck??? Please solve this properly instead of hiding it. 
> /proc/timer_stats is damn useful and it's a must-have for powertop to 
> work.

Hmm.  Perhaps the dependency conflict should go in the other direction
then.

My goal is to document the issue while a proper fix is being written.
I have known about this for all of about 1 day now.  It was added since
last time I went through the kernel and made a thorough sweep of pid users.

What the proper fix is isn't even obvious at this point.
Possibly it is making /proc/timer_stats disappear in child pid namespaces.
  Which we don't currently have the infrastructure fore.
Possibly it is reworking the stats collection so we store a struct pid *
instead of a pid_t value.  So we would know if the reader of the value
can even see processes you have collected stats for.

It is going to take a bit to digest what is going on and solve this properly.

In the same vein do we actively have interesting user space programs
using /proc/sched_debug?  It is the same class of problem.  Yet
another interface talking to user space with pids.

Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/