[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071213130423.GB28340@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 14:04:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark timer_stats as incompatible with multiple pid
namespaces
* Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> > What the heck??? Please solve this properly instead of hiding it.
> > /proc/timer_stats is damn useful and it's a must-have for powertop
> > to work.
>
> Hmm. Perhaps the dependency conflict should go in the other direction
> then.
>
> My goal is to document the issue while a proper fix is being written.
> I have known about this for all of about 1 day now. It was added
> since last time I went through the kernel and made a thorough sweep of
> pid users.
>
> What the proper fix is isn't even obvious at this point. Possibly it
> is making /proc/timer_stats disappear in child pid namespaces.
> Which we don't currently have the infrastructure fore.
>
> Possibly it is reworking the stats collection so we store a struct pid
> * instead of a pid_t value. So we would know if the reader of the
> value can even see processes you have collected stats for.
the problem is, this interface stores historic PIDs too - i.e. PIDs of
tasks that might have exited already.
the proper way would be to also store the namespace address, and to
filter out non-matching entries. (If leakage of this data across
namespace creation is of any concern then flush out existing namespace
data when a namespace is destroyed)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists