[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476093B6.7080306@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:06:46 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dpreed@...d.com,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, pavel@....cz,
andi@...stfloor.org, rol@...917.net,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, david@...idnewall.com,
john@...ffel.org, linux-os@...logic.com
Subject: Re: [RFT] Port 0x80 I/O speed
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Dec 12 2007 00:31, Rene Herman wrote:
>> Would some people on x86 (both 32 and 64) be kind enough to compile and run the
>> attached program? This is about testing how long I/O port access to port 0x80
>> takes. It measures in CPU cycles so CPU speed is crucial in reporting.
>>
>
> Transmeta TM5800 CPU with nominal frequency 933 MHz, but it has a
> hardware(!) 'ondemand' governor over the range of frequencies that
> the user allowed scaling over, irrespective of the software governor.
> (That is, if the CPU can do 300,533 and 933 MHz, and setting the
> min/max to 300/533 will cause the hardware to 'ondemand' between 300
> and 533 only. And that even if 'performance' is set on the software
> side - so the only way to enforce 'performance' is to actually set
> min=933.)
>
Actually it has two different ones (economy and performance), you can
use the "longrun" utility to select which one.
Either way, all Transmeta processors have a fixed TSC, so there is no issue.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists