[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47609BCB.30702@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:41:15 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
CC: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dpreed@...d.com,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, pavel@....cz,
andi@...stfloor.org, rol@...917.net,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>, david@...idnewall.com,
john@...ffel.org, linux-os@...logic.com
Subject: Re: [RFT] Port 0x80 I/O speed
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 12-12-07 06:23, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:31:18AM +0100, Rene Herman wrote:
>>> asm volatile ("rdtsc": "=A" (tsc));
>>
>> rdtsc returns a 64-bit value in two 32-bit regs, you need to do
>>
>> inline unsigned long long rdtsc(void)
>> {
>> unsigned int lo, hi;
>> asm volatile ("rdtsc": "=a" (lo), "=d" (hi));
>> return (unsigned long long)hi << 32 | lo;
>> }
>>
>> as in msr.h, otherwise you'll only be looking at the value in %rax.
>
> On 32-bit, "=A" is edx:eax. Not sure what the point is in not letting it
> be that on 64-bit in fact, but yes, the thing should be compiled as 32-bit.
On 64-bit, "=A" is rdx:rax, which means that a 64-bit value ends up in
rax only (a 128-bit value, which gcc does support on 128-bit platforms,
would be in rdx:rax.)
gcc can't deal internally with values that span partial registers.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists