[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071213202125.GA25130@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:21:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: vincent.fortier1@...gc.ca,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, maneesh@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ?
* Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> > > > This one also fails to apply properly at the exact same place
> > > > has Ingo's previously posted patch. Would need to backport his
> > > > one.
> > >
> > > It depends on a completely reworked sysfs logic, I don't think it
> > > makes any sense to backport that.
> >
> > well, if it fixes a live bug in a still supported stable kernel
> > release...
> >
> > Vincent, could you try to just get rid of all actual uses of
> > se->attr.owner, within fs/sysfs/*.c? Something like the patch below.
> > (totally untested - might be fatally broken as well)
>
> How can you think that this is not needed? You can not remove it with
> sysfs you are patching. Hope this explains it:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0ab66088c855eca68513bdd7442a426c4b374ced
yeah - as i said it might be fatally broken (in fact it is). Do we
understand why Vincent got the crashes with vanilla 2.6.22.14 ?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists