[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <47624F26.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:38:46 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix ref-counting bug in change_page_attr()
>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> 14.12.07 08:12 >>>
>Jan Beulich wrote:
>> When either calling change_page_attr() with the default attributes
>> pages in the direct mapping have and a page's attributes already were
>> set to the default or when changing the attributes from one non-default
>> value to another, the reference counting broke, leading to either
>> premature restoration of a large page or missing the opportunity to do
>> so.
>>
>> At the same time, make __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT on 64-bits the value it
>> architecturally ought to have.
>>
>
>Could you put this in a separate patch? I have a bunch of page*.h and
>pgtable*.h refactoring patches which will conflict with this.
I doesn't seem logical to do so: The patch needs to introduce the definitions
for 32-bits (in order to define pte_pgprot()), and not doing the adjustment
for 64-bits here means (a) becoming inconsistent and (b) the pte_pgprot()
there would be incorrect. So such a split out patch would need to be a pre-
requisite to the one here, which wouldn't help avoiding the collisions with
your unification patches.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists