[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47624253.7060507@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:44:03 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: clean up asm-x86/page*.h
Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_64.c
>> @@ -158,22 +158,22 @@ void dump_pagetable(unsigned long addres
>> pgd = __va((unsigned long)pgd & PHYSICAL_PAGE_MASK);
>> pgd += pgd_index(address);
>> if (bad_address(pgd)) goto bad;
>> - printk("PGD %lx ", pgd_val(*pgd));
>> + printk("PGD %lx ", (unsigned long)pgd_val(*pgd));
>>
>
> Casts like this here and elsewhere look rather odd (in fact I think using
> casts should really be limited to places where you either can't do it
> differently or the code would become badly readable or much uglier
> without them). I would therefore favor simply using the right formatting
> specifier here.
I would agree, but pgd_val() is defined as returning a pgdval_t, which
is typedefed to be unsigned long. I'll have another look, but I don't
think there's an appropriate format for this.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists