[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1197624375.4632.44.camel@gaivota>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:26:15 -0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Shane <gnome42@...il.com>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Brandon Philips <brandon@...p.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
video4linux-list <video4linux-list@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] videobuf-core.c locking fixes
Em Qua, 2007-12-12 às 16:22 -0500, Shane escreveu:
> > Yes it does! I was just going to send the same patch myself :)
>
> But, I am now seeing some errors that weren't there in 2.6.23
>
> kernel: bttv0: SCERR @ 1fa0401c,bits: HSYNC OFLOW SCERR*
> last message repeated 15 times
> kernel: bttv0: timeout: drop=16 irq=105615/105615, risc=1fa0401c,
> bits: HSYNC OFLOW
> kernel: bttv0: reset, reinitialize
> kernel: bttv0: PLL can sleep, using XTAL (28636363).
>
> kernel: bttv0: SCERR @ 1fa0401c,bits: HSYNC OFLOW SCERR*
> last message repeated 15 times
> kernel: bttv0: timeout: drop=16 irq=106741/106741, risc=1fa0401c,
> bits: HSYNC OFLOW
> kernel: bttv0: reset, reinitialize
> kernel: bttv0: PLL can sleep, using XTAL (28636363).
>
> These happen occasionally and it causes an EIO DQBUF
> error and the application has to re queue the buffers but it
> recovers OK. Not sure if it causes some sort of internal
> kernel corruption that will only be noticed later possibly?
>
> I am using 15 userptr buffers so whatever is happening may
> be happening once per buffer sometimes. dunno
You may see such troubles with weak signals, where bttv is not capable of getting the proper sync.
--
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists