[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071214180246.GT17536@waste.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:02:46 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE no-ops when CONFIG_BUG is off
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:27:55PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Hi:
>
> [PATCH] Make WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE no-ops when CONFIG_BUG is off
>
> The description of CONFIG_BUG clearly states that both BUG and
> WARN_ON may be skipped. However, our actual implementation still
> checks the condition on WARN_ON if it's used as part of an if
> statement or such.
>
> This patch makes it return 0 after evaluating the expression
> if CONFIG_BUG is disabled. This is consistent with the spirit
> of the CONFIG_BUG option.
I added CONFIG_BUG, and I think the current behavior is correct. As
you've noticed, we have to evaluate condition, it may have
side-effects. And if code does:
/* this indicates a driver bug, report and fail gracefully */
if (WARN_ON(val == NULL))
return -EFAULT;
..we surely want it to continue returning -EFAULT, regardless of
whether we log it, no? What use case did you have in mind?
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists