[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071215041659.GB25324@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:16:59 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make WARN_ON/WARN_ON_ONCE no-ops when CONFIG_BUG is off
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:02:46PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> I added CONFIG_BUG, and I think the current behavior is correct. As
> you've noticed, we have to evaluate condition, it may have
> side-effects. And if code does:
>
> /* this indicates a driver bug, report and fail gracefully */
> if (WARN_ON(val == NULL))
> return -EFAULT;
That's exactly the sort of use I had in mind :) I'm actually the
one who added the ability to use WARN_ON inside an if clause.
Just as the case of a BUG_ON, a WARN_ON should never occur in
practice, unless there is a bug which the code is not aware of.
As such we want it to go away completely if CONFIG_BUG is off.
> ..we surely want it to continue returning -EFAULT, regardless of
> whether we log it, no? What use case did you have in mind?
If you're using it for a scenario which is known to actually
occur, then some other mechanism should be chosen in place of
WARN_ON.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists