linux-kernel - Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18273.61952.774601.392188@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 14 Dec 2007 14:01:20 +1100
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c

Dave Jones writes:

> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c: In function 'register_pmu_pm_ops':
> drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:2481: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_set_ops'

What tree is this against?  I don't see any occurrences of pmu_pm_ops
in either 2.6.23 or Linus' current tree, or in my published
powerpc.git tree.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/