linux-kernel - Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071214031246.GB14000@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:12:46 -0500
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dwmw2@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Fix implicit declaration in via-pmu.c

On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 02:01:20PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
 > Dave Jones writes:
 > 
 > > drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c: In function 'register_pmu_pm_ops':
 > > drivers/macintosh/via-pmu.c:2481: error: implicit declaration of function 'pm_set_ops'
 > 
 > What tree is this against?  I don't see any occurrences of pmu_pm_ops
 > in either 2.6.23 or Linus' current tree, or in my published
 > powerpc.git tree.

*grmbl*, it's on top of a bunch of other ppc suspend bits.
I blame dwmw2.

You can safely drop this.   Thanks.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/