[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071215131204.GE9720@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:12:04 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@...ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <hiramatu@....hitachi.co.jp>,
Rusty Lynch <rusty.lynch@...el.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Keshavamurthy Anil S <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
Subject: Re: FInal kprobes rollup patches
* Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
> If you compare this memcpy from arch_prepare_kprobe in 32/64 bit I'm
> almost sure the X86_32 version should be
>
> ... + sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)
>
> not
>
> ... * sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)
good point. I've Cc:-ed the top authors of kprobes.c. Could anyone
confirm (or deny) that Harvey found a real kprobes bug here?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists