[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071215131723.GF9720@elte.hu>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:17:23 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ehabkost@...hat.com,
jeremy@...p.org, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, hpa@...or.com,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] unify paravirt parts of system.h
* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > Linux never uses that register. The only user is suspend
> > save/restore, but that' bogus because it wasn't ever initialized by
> > Linux in the first place. It could be probably all safely removed.
>
> It probably is safe to remove... but we currently support '2.8.95
> kernel loads/resumes 2.6.24 image'... which would break if 2.8 uses
> cr8.
>
> So please keep it if it is not a big problem.
hm, so __save_processor_state() is in essence an ABI? Could you please
also send a patch that documents this prominently, in the structure
itself?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists