[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14339868.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:31:22 -0800 (PST)
From: a_kumar <cable_plug2000@...oo.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: how to implement this logic?
Hi,
I've a block device driver which does the following,
Inside the request function I do something like this:
request(fn) {
while ((req = elv_next_request(q)) != NULL) {
....................set up the request;
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
call the transfer(set_up_req) function;
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
}
spin_unlock_irq (q->queue_lock);
/* allow callback to execute as it needs the lock!!! */
spin_lock_irq (q->queue_lock);
}
and the transfer function calls the scsi_execute_asyn(....) with the
callback function doing the end request. So, the ending of the request is
done like below:
callback(fn) {
spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
if (!end_that_request_first(set_up_req->req, cmpstatus,
set_up_req->req->nr_sectors)) {
add_disk_randomness(...);
end_that_request_last(set_up_req->req,0);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
}
This code works fine with most of the kernel versions, but fails on some
like , Linux 2.6.18-8.el5-xen
Please help me to find out where I'm going wrong?
Thanks in advance for an early reply.
Anil P.
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/how-to-implement-this-logic--tp14339868p14339868.html
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists