[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712150151.49025.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:51:47 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de,
Simon Holm Thøgersen <odie@...aau.dk>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>, matthias.kaehlcke@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@...mer.net,
kjwinchester@...il.com, jonathan@...masters.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: wireless: bcm43xx: big_buffer_sem semaphore to mutex
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Friday 14 December 2007 13:59:54 Simon Holm Thøgersen wrote:
> > > This user did get the following messages in dmesg:
> > >
> > > b43err(dev->wl, "Firmware file \"%s\" not found "
> > > "or load failed.\n", path);
> >
> > So the question seems to be why b43 needs version 4, when b43legacy and
> > bcm43x uses version 3?
>
> That's really a question, right?
>
> Well. linux-2.4 doesn't work with the linux-2.6 modutils.
> Windows Vista doesn't work with Windows 98 device drivers.
> That leads to this assumption:
> b43 doesn't work with version 3 firmware but needs version 4.
>
> Newer drivers supporting newer hardware need newer firmware.
Actually, can you explain why, from the technical point of view, the version 4
firware is better than version 3, please?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists