linux-kernel - Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071218.142956.26529678.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:29:56 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de
Cc:	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...e.de, krh@...planet.net,
	linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)

From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:38:27 +0100

> Also note:
>   - The very same code did not oops at this point in 2.6.22.  It only
>     started doing so in 2.6.23.

2.6.23 is when the sparc64 IOMMU code started relying upon
the dev_archdata bits being correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/