[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071218.143026.78772130.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:30:26 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de
Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...e.de, krh@...planet.net,
linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: No dma_sync_* during pci_probe? (Sparc, post 2.6.22 regression)
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:38:27 +0100
> - There has been no other report of this kind for any other
> architecture yet. I would expect e.g. the PPC64 folks to report
> bugs in our dma mappings eventually.
Irrelevant fact, powerpc handles it's dev_archdata differently
from sparc64.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists