lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:10:42 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Daniel Ritz <daniel.ritz@....ch>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: PCI resource problems caused by improper address rounding


> That won't work, because PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 controls how
> many bits need to be written back to the BAR.  If we changed that
> to PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_32, we wouldn't clear the high 32-bits
> of the BAR.
> 
> > ... and that would be an X server issue!).
> 
> Of course, fixing the X server to *handle* 64-bit BARs is the correct
> solution.  I've no idea how involved that is, but I have a sneeking
> suspicion that it uses that damned CARD32 datatype for everything.

A lot more than X needs to be fixed to handle 64-bit BARs btw. There's a
whole load of places in drivers/pci/* where we just puke if we see a
value >4G being assigned.

Now, there is some hope that the new X with libpciaccess can cope with
that, and even if it is broken, it would be much easier to fix, as X in
that case is no longer trying to bypass the kernel, but instead uses
proper kernel interfaces to map device resources.

That used to be Xorg pci-rework branch, though it might have been merged
in the  trunk by now.
 
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ