[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5d6222a80712201322t46591ce2n5cf3248aa2e1dd26@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:22:24 -0200
From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <glommer@...il.com>
To: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <gcosta@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, ehabkost@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org,
avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
hpa@...or.com, zach@...are.com, roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] move patching code to arch-specific file.
On Dec 20, 2007 6:33 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> > this patch adds the paravirt_patch_32.o:
> >
> > > -obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) += paravirt.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_PARAVIRT) += paravirt.o paravirt_patch_32.o
> >
> > but does not add that file nor any other rule to build that target, so
> > it fails to build with the attached config:
> >
> > make[1]: *** No rule to make target
> > `arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_patch_32.o', needed by
> > `arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o'. Stop.
>
> if it's just that single missing file then please send me a patch that
> adds that file and i'll add it to this patch. (instead of resending the
> whole series)
Yeah, I must have forgotten to git-add it.
It was building here fine, because I clearly have the file locally ;-)
I'm attaching a new patch that replaces just this one.
--
Glauber de Oliveira Costa.
"Free as in Freedom"
http://glommer.net
"The less confident you are, the more serious you have to act."
View attachment "0001-move-patching-code-to-arch-specific-file.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (6001 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists