[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476ADD05.5090801@opengridcomputing.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:22:13 -0600
From: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To: benh@....ibm.com
CC: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bherren@....ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
OpenFabrics General <general@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
Wen Xiong <wenxiong@...ibm.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Paul Mackerras <pmac@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] iommu dma mapping alignment requirements
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 13:29 -0600, Steve Wise wrote:
>
>> Or based on the alignment of vaddr actually...
>
> The later wouldn't be realistic. What I think might be necessay, though
> it would definitely cause us problems with running out of iommu space
> (which is the reason we did the switch down to 4K), is to provide
> alignment to the real page size, and alignement to the allocation order
> for dma_map_consistent.
>
> It might be possible to -tweak- and only provide alignment to the page
> size for allocations that are larger than IOMMU_PAGE_SIZE. That would
> solve the problem with small network packets eating up too much iommu
> space though.
>
> What do you think ?
That might work.
If you gimme a patch, i'll try it out!
Steve.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists