[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071221024211.f4207136.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:42:11 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: trond.myklebust@....uio.no, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.24-rc5 x86 architecture no longer Oopses...
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:27:27 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > local_read_flags().
> >
> > > that should have been raw_local_irq_save(flags)!
> >
> > So raw_local_save_flags() and raw_local_irq_save() have different semantics.
> >
> > omigawd, what have we done?
>
> i really tried to get this fixed years ago - but did not think of
> local_read_flags as a solution. The patch below fixes this.
>
> (if it's too burdensome to carry right now then i can regenerate this
> patch in 30 seconds in the 2.6.25 merge window - but please remind me
> then. Perhaps put in a patch into your queue that adds a comment to
> remind me :-) )
I'd suggest that we add a local_read_flags() along with local_save_flags().
Then I can merge the parts of the patch which don't get destroyed by ongoing
churn and then we can come in and clean up the stragglers later.
box:/usr/src/25> grep -l local_save_flags patches/*.patch
patches/git-perfmon.patch
patches/git-sh.patch
patches/git-x86.patch
patches/i386-use-raw_smp_processor_id-in-die.patch
patches/mn10300-add-the-mn10300-am33-architecture-to-the-kernel.patch
patches/origin.patch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists