[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476BD94F.6060002@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:18:39 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, joe@...ches.com,
davem@...emloft.net, apw@...dowen.org, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, elendil@...net.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
trivial@...nel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Dec 21 2007 17:56, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>As to what is a complete sentence, that is debatable. However,
>>typically it would include a subject and a predicate. By this
>>rule the following line is not a complete sentence:
>>
>> [XFS] Initialise current offset in xfs_file_readdir correctly
>>
>>The reason is that it lacks a subject.
>
> "current offset" is your subject.
It's an object, not the subject.
The quoted changelog heading is a complete sentence nevertheless, as it
is an imperative sentence. Its subject is implied.
It could end in a period or in an exclamation mark. But as it's
actually a heading, it doesn't have to and probably shouldn't.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ==-- =-=-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists