[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <476BDDA1.4040302@davidnewall.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:07:05 +1030
From: David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: jengelh@...putergmbh.de, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, joe@...ches.com, apw@...dowen.org,
lizf@...fujitsu.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, elendil@...net.nl,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
trivial@...nel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
David Miller wrote:
> From: David Newall <david@...idnewall.com>
> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:13:07 +1030
>> David Miller wrote:
>>
>>> From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
>>> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:10:38 +0100 (CET)
>>>
>>>
>>>> Can we get back to programming?
>>>>
>> With respect to the vast majority of log messages, nobody confounded by
>> punctuation is truly trying to analyze a problem!
>>
>
> And nobody confounded by whitespace and coding style is truly
> interesting in writing properly functioning code!
>
I supposed you meant "interested." Proper coding style doesn't make for
proper code. Arguably, it aids when reading code, and that's why we
mostly stick to agreed standards; but it's hard to get worked up over a
dot at the end of a log message. In cases where it really does matter,
we make sure it's right; but demanding that every message meets some
unilateral idea of what is right is zealotry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists