[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071220.191255.265293332.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 19:12:55 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: elendil@...net.nl, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, apw@...dowen.org,
joe@...ches.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, trivial@...nel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Trailing periods in kernel messages
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:15:32 -0800
> No-period is a kernel idiom, produces perfectly readable output, I have
> never ever heard of anyone expressing the least concern over a lack of dots
> at the end of their printks and 91% of kernel code agrees.
I have never heard of a compiler expressing the least concern over
whitespace and other aspects of coding style.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists