linux-kernel - Re: Testing RAM from userspace / question about memmap= arguments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071222184309.GA31809@elf.ucw.cz>
Date:	Sat, 22 Dec 2007 19:43:09 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Richard D <richard@...unus.com>
Cc:	'Matthew Bloch' <matthew@...emark.co.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Testing RAM from userspace / question about memmap= arguments

On Sat 2007-12-22 21:00:11, Richard D wrote:
> I was thinking that by the time userspace is ready, the memory that can be
> tested will be less.

Which does not matter when you can test the rest using second
(kexec-ed) kernel, right?
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/