[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712261047.35810.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2007 10:47:35 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: lguest@...abs.org, glommer@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/16] map_switcher_in_guest() per-vcpu
On Friday 21 December 2007 00:33:49 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> The switcher needs to be mapped per-vcpu, because different vcpus
> will potentially have different page tables (they don't have to,
> because threads will share the same).
>
> So our first step is the make the function receive a vcpu struct
Hmm, I wonder if we should call it lg_vcpu: lguest_vcpu is a little long, and
in total adds a fair number of lines to the code :)
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists