[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0712270243370.32714@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 02:44:33 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>,
tglx@...utronix.de, viro@....linux.org.uk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arch/x86: Use offsetof
On Dec 26 2007 17:01, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > @@ -215,7 +215,9 @@ asmlinkage int sys_vm86old(struct pt_reg
>> > ret = -EFAULT;
>> > if (tmp)
>> > goto out;
>> > - memset(&info.vm86plus, 0, (int)&info.regs32 - (int)&info.vm86plus);
>> > + memset(&info.vm86plus, 0,
>> > + offsetof(struct kernel_vm86_struct, regs32) -
>> > + offsetof(struct kernel_vm86_struct, vm86plus));
>>
>> I do not think this makes it more readable... (int) -> (char *) would
>> make it portable and readable, AFAICT.
>> Pavel
>
> The right way to do it is:
>
> memset(&info.vm86plus, 0, sizeof info.vm86plus);
Either way, downcasting a pointer to (int) is dangerous,
even if this one occurrence happens to be in 32-bit-only code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists