linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200712272340.42866.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:40:41 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>
Cc:	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>,
	pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Fix the ACPI 1.0 vs ACPI 2.0 suspend ordering issue

On Thursday, 27 of December 2007, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> On Thursday 27 December 2007 18:03:52 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please review (and test, if possible).
> 
> Suspend now works properly here with this patch set.
> 
> Tested-by: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>

Thanks a lot for testing!

Greetings,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/