[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080103104220.GA1732@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:42:20 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Carlos Corbacho <carlos@...angeworlds.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@...il.com>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] ACPI: Separate invocations of _GTS and _BFS
from _PTS and _WAK
On Thu 2007-12-27 19:15:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>
> The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is
> currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the
> leaving of the sleep state, respectively. However, these functions
> are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling
> them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them
> ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the
> ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering
> the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the
> platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up.
>
> Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
Seems ok to me, but it is 2.6.25 material earliest, right?
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists