[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1199036554.4170.9.camel@homer.simson.net>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:42:34 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch?] s2ram + P4 + tsc = annoyance
On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 15:08 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ok, i prefer this fix a bit more. (we dont want to set last_tsc
> > outside of the sync_lock - which your initial patch does)
>
> i've added your patch to x86.git - thanks Mike! (patch below) I think
> this would be too dangerous for v2.6.24 though - we can put it back into
> -stable for 2.6.24.1, once it had more testing?
Methinks it's about as low a priority as exists. Google returned me and
one other fellow...
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists