[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080104163914.GA27447@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 17:39:14 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch?] s2ram + P4 + tsc = annoyance
On Sun 2007-12-30 15:08:15, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > ok, i prefer this fix a bit more. (we dont want to set last_tsc
> > outside of the sync_lock - which your initial patch does)
>
> i've added your patch to x86.git - thanks Mike! (patch below) I think
> this would be too dangerous for v2.6.24 though - we can put it back into
> -stable for 2.6.24.1, once it had more testing?
If it is too dangerous for -final, I guess it is bad idea to push it
into -stable.
Plus it does not fix really bad bug.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists