[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712302204.56977.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:04:56 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on x86-64
On Sunday, 30 of December 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> >
> > Document the fact that __save_processor_state() has to save all CPU
> > registers referred to by the kernel in case a different kernel is used
> > to load and restore a hibernation image containing it.
>
> ok - so i guess i should drop this from x86.git:
>
> @@ -53,7 +53,6 @@ void __save_processor_state(struct saved
> ctxt->cr2 = read_cr2();
> ctxt->cr3 = read_cr3();
> ctxt->cr4 = read_cr4();
> - ctxt->cr8 = read_cr8();
> }
>
> right?
Well, if cr8 is used for anything that matters, then yes.
> But i'm wondering - are we really ever resuming to a different
> kernel version, for this to be an issue?
The boot kernel may be different from the kernel within the image, if that's
what you're asking for.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists