[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071230215745.GB31386@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:57:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hibernation: Document __save_processor_state() on
x86-64
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > what's exactly in the hibernation image? Dirty data i suppose
>
> No, everything, including the kernel code, page tables etc. :-)
>
> > - but what about kernel-internal pages. What if we go from SLAB to
> > SLUB? What if the size of a structure changes? Etc.
>
> We can go from SLAB to SLUB just fine, it doesn't matter. The only
> thing that matters is we have to jump to the right address at the end
> of core_restore_code() (defined in arch/x86/kernel/suspend_asm_64.S).
ok, just to make sure we are talking about the same thing. Do you mean
we can restore an image saved by v2.6.12 into v2.6.24? I.e. a 2.6.24
kernel will be able to run a 2.6.12 kernel's hibernation image, with all
the kernel internal data from v2.6.12, etc? No way can that work.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists